Thursday, 8 September 2016

BREAKING NEWS #UNISONGATE hearing dates agreed

11 Unison members’ complaints about UNISON General Secretary Elections 2015 hearing dates have been confirmed.

The following UNISON members have submitted a number of joint complaints to the Certification Officer

1.    John Burgess
2.    Adam Tipple
3.    Phil O Reilly
4.    Patrick  Hunter
5.    Claire Dixon
6.    Liz James
7.    Alan Wylie
8.    Hugh Jordan
9.    Maggi Myland
10. Helen Davies
11. John Harris

We have had confirmation that All Certification Office hearings are open to the public to attend.

There is a preliminary hearing followed by a case management discussion to take place on Thursday 6 October.

The preliminary hearing and subsequent case management discussion will instead take place at 10.00 AM on Thursday 6 October 2016 at the below venue:-

Melia White House
Albany Street
Regents Park
NW1 3UP     

Details of this venue, including how to get there, please see the following link:

The main hearing has been allocated and is due to take place on 3 and 4 November 2016

There are three other complainants who have also submitted their own complaints to the Certification Officer and these will be a part of the above meetings.

More news later…………

Background to the complaints:

To understand some of the issues please listen and read the information and links below which have been all online in the public domain for almost 10 months.

1. Whistleblowing tape – 21 October 2015
A damning audiotape emerged in early December 2015 provided evidence that senior officials of Britain’s biggest public service union, UNISON, had allegedly acted in blatant breach of the union’s own rules to secure the incumbent general secretary’s re-election.

The audio file can be downloaded online here:  

The audio recording repeatedly features the voice of UNISON’s London regional secretary, who can be heard repeatedly thanking paid union officials under her management for their work in securing branch nominations for the three-term incumbent UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis.

“We have done very well and I want to thank everybody and congratulate them on getting the nominations that they have got. This is a list of the Greater London branch nominations for Dave Prentis the deadline closed last Friday, I do not have a list of the other candidates, and that will appear in due course but I haven’t got it. But we have done very well, we’ve got almost 50 nominations here so that is excellent and thanks very much, er Dave is very very pleased and he has related that to me personally er it is very important because obviously this is going to be a hard fought election.”
(UNISON London Regional Secretary to UNISON London Region paid officials on 21 October 2015).  

The recording includes derogatory references to Mr Prentis’ three election opponents (Roger Bannister, John Burgess and Heather Wakefield) and their supporters along with a detailed discussion of what London regional officials can do to bolster the Prentis campaign in the days running up to the start of the postal ballot on 9 November. There is also an explicit warning not to get “caught out”, while mention of the union’s election rules provokes widespread laughter.

2. Team Dave campaign emails
The public were first made aware of the Team Dave campaign emails when an article appeared in Private Eye in early February.

You can read the Private Eye article here

Here are some extracts from the above Private Eye article

“Leaked emails reach the Eye providing more evidence that full-time staff of Unison mobilised to get general secretary Dave Prentis re-elected in December making the union’s claim to be a “member-led” look increasingly questionable.”


“The emails passed to the Eye from within the Prentis campaign indicate that Unison officials were in fact the backbone of “Team Dave”. The emails were sent by assistant general secretary Cliff Williams in October and November. The bulk of the recipients were other Unison officials – a rough count shows 45 of 50 addresses are regional secretaries, head office staff and other unison staff.”

 “One striking “Team Dave” note says: “it may be in some circumstance you may be able to ‘circumvent’ hostile branches by working with sympathetic employer contacts. I acknowledge that some colleagues may feel this is ethically inappropriate but it doesn’t breach campaign rules; it will have to be done with caution.”

It may not break campaign rules, but it still doesn’t look good. Similarly, having Unison officials lead the Prentis campaign doesn’t match the spirit of the union being “member led”.

The third extract above is in our view one of the most damming, especially for those grassroots reps and members who have been fighting employers who are either sacking, privatising or cutting the Terms and Conditions of our members. The idea that paid officials would go behind the backs of local branches is appalling and has no place in a trade union. To date there has been no condemnation of these remarks or any investigation.

The “Team Dave” emails are further evidence of a national campaign and provide a context to the content of the audio tape of the meeting in London on 21 October 2015. 

Read Three earlier Private Eye articles here
1.    Unison on tape
2.    A family affair
3.    A greasy poll


No comments:

Post a Comment