"Our Libraries, Our NHS, Our Schools, Our homes, our Wardens, our streets, our land, our old, our young, our past, our future."
"Hands off our Barnet"
Today I received sad news that Julian Silverman had passed away on Boxing Day. Julian may not so well known outside Barnet, but he was amongst the activist community here in Barnet. Julian one of the key people who organised and set up Barnet Alliance for Public Services (BAPS).
I was present when Julian came up with the statement above which summed up what we were all about.
It seemed ambitious but back then we had a real energy in our community and no obstacle was too big.
It would be fair to say, Julian was very political and craved political debate over the issues we were fighting. He never missed an opportunity to try to engage with the Tory politicians who were hell bent on outsourcing all of the Council services. He knew he was unlikely to succeed but he did it anyway. I sat in many public council meeting where he took up his right to address council committees. Julian lived and breathed activism and was always ready to take up a campaign in his community. He was heavily involved in some of the housing campaigns particularly in West Hendon.
I hadn't known he was unwell until recently and I had been told he was on the mend.
I am glad and proud to have been able to work with Julian.
We need more comrades like Julian, who do more than just talk about activism, they just get on with it.
Rest In Peace comrade
John, member of Barnet Alliance for Public Services.
Best wishes
John
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
Support Derby City TAs and Unisongate update
On my way to #Unisongate Day Two for Cross examination of UNISON witnesses.
I want to take this opportunity to remember what is important and at the heart of everything I believe grassroots organisations should be about.
Derby City Council Teaching Assistants have been taking strike action against a massive cut in salary imposed by a Labour Council which to date has taken an adversarial approach to any attempt to address this injustice.
Consider this heartbreaking story of a TA selling her home.
http://m.derbytelegraph.co.uk/derby-teaching-assistant-forced-to-sell-littleover-home-and-downsize-after-city-council-pay-changes/story-29983877-detail/story.html
I heard similar stories in Durham.
What is going on in our society when an employer thinks they can impose such a life threatening pay cut on low paid workers.
For me this is a reason why grassroots trade unions are still needed. The mainstream union movement needs to radically change. The politics and tactics of appeasement are not working and I'd argue they never would. The challenge has to be to mobilise and build an active fighting resilient trade union movement that inspires members to get involved and tackle the worrying increase in inequalities both with our communities but our workplaces.
I have made a lot of messages of support for the Durham TAs campaign, and I would to help if possible to help the Derby City TAs. They are striking and it is likely to continue next term.
I am asking all my friends comrades supporters to send solidarity messages to Derby City Unison branch.
We must stay with them until they win as we are going to do for the Durham TAs.
Yesterday I heard many bad things at Unisongate hearing and I no doubt will hear more today. I learnt a comrade had been threatened by union lawyers for libel. My view is this is unacceptable, we badly need union resources allocated to grassroots union branches so they can swiftly support members in the workplace. We also need trade union reps who are not going to look away when they see something wrong. What use is a rep if they don't speak out when they see injustice. Grassroots reps risk their employment every time they speak up for members. It is a risk with being a rep, but if we are a strong union the risk of attack by employer is low. Sadly employers at the moment are only afraid of a few unions not all.
So with a heavy heart I make my way to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, but with an even stronger determination to continue to build and organise workers where ever I am.
Solidarity to the Derby City TAs
Solidarity to the Durham TAs
Solidarity to all grassroots reps & members.
I want to take this opportunity to remember what is important and at the heart of everything I believe grassroots organisations should be about.
Derby City Council Teaching Assistants have been taking strike action against a massive cut in salary imposed by a Labour Council which to date has taken an adversarial approach to any attempt to address this injustice.
Consider this heartbreaking story of a TA selling her home.
http://m.derbytelegraph.co.uk/derby-teaching-assistant-forced-to-sell-littleover-home-and-downsize-after-city-council-pay-changes/story-29983877-detail/story.html
I heard similar stories in Durham.
What is going on in our society when an employer thinks they can impose such a life threatening pay cut on low paid workers.
For me this is a reason why grassroots trade unions are still needed. The mainstream union movement needs to radically change. The politics and tactics of appeasement are not working and I'd argue they never would. The challenge has to be to mobilise and build an active fighting resilient trade union movement that inspires members to get involved and tackle the worrying increase in inequalities both with our communities but our workplaces.
I have made a lot of messages of support for the Durham TAs campaign, and I would to help if possible to help the Derby City TAs. They are striking and it is likely to continue next term.
I am asking all my friends comrades supporters to send solidarity messages to Derby City Unison branch.
We must stay with them until they win as we are going to do for the Durham TAs.
Yesterday I heard many bad things at Unisongate hearing and I no doubt will hear more today. I learnt a comrade had been threatened by union lawyers for libel. My view is this is unacceptable, we badly need union resources allocated to grassroots union branches so they can swiftly support members in the workplace. We also need trade union reps who are not going to look away when they see something wrong. What use is a rep if they don't speak out when they see injustice. Grassroots reps risk their employment every time they speak up for members. It is a risk with being a rep, but if we are a strong union the risk of attack by employer is low. Sadly employers at the moment are only afraid of a few unions not all.
So with a heavy heart I make my way to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, but with an even stronger determination to continue to build and organise workers where ever I am.
Solidarity to the Derby City TAs
Solidarity to the Durham TAs
Solidarity to all grassroots reps & members.
Sunday, 18 December 2016
BreakingNews: “UNISON: Union democracy on trial.” #Unisongate
On Monday 19 December UNISON
the Trade Union with 1.3 million members is on trial facing serious allegations
about the running of the election campaign that saw Dave Prentis elected
general secretary of Britain’s largest public sector union, Unison last year.
The complainants allege that
Unison breached its rules and the 1992 Act in relation to the election for the
position of General Secretary of UNISON in late 2015.
The Hearing begins Monday 19
December to Wednesday 21 December (10am) inclusive and it is being held at:
Employment
Appeal Tribunal, Fleetbank House, LONDON, EC4Y 8JX.
The complaints were registered
by UNISON members after a whistle-blower provided an audio-tape of paid officials
plotting to campaign for Dave Prentis.
The complainants allege:
“The breach occurred at a
meeting organised and attended by UNISON officials in the Greater London Region
which took place at the UNISON premises known as Congress House and where UNISON
staff received a briefing on how to campaign for the re-election of David
Prentis.”
The plot thickened when an
article regarding campaign “Team Dave” emails were published by Private Eye in
February 2016.
“Team Dave; Update No 20 sent
at 09.44 on Friday 23 October 2015. States ‘It may be that in some
circumstances you may be able to “circumvent” hostile branches by covertly
working with sympathetic employer contacts. ….”
Full details of all of the
complaints can be found on the Certification Office website here:
If the Assistant Certification
Officer were to find against UNISON and make an Enforcement Order to order a re-run of the election then (with the
recent announcement that Len McClusky, Unite General Secretary has called an
early election next year) there could be two general secretary elections taking
place in 2017 affecting more than 3 million trade union members.
Notes to Editors.
Contact details: John Burgess 07835116441 or email: burgessjohn37@hotmail.com
Background #Unisongate
complaints:
1.
#Unisongate makes BBC Radio 4 Today Programme
2.
“UNISON: Union democracy on trial.”
4. Whistleblowing tape – 21 October 2015
A damning audio-tape emerged in early December 2015 providing
evidence that senior officials of Britain’s biggest public service union,
UNISON, had allegedly acted in blatant breach of the union’s own rules to
secure the incumbent General Secretary’s re-election. The 23-minute tape
appeared on an Anonymous Blog here:
The audio file can be downloaded online here:
The audio recording largely features the voice of UNISON’s London
Regional Secretary, repeatedly thanking paid union officials under her
management for their work in securing branch nominations for the three-term
incumbent UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis.
“We have done very well and I want to thank everybody and
congratulate them on getting the nominations that they have got. This is a list
of the Greater London branch nominations for Dave Prentis the deadline closed
last Friday, I do not have a list of the other candidates, and that will appear
in due course but I haven’t got it. But we have done very well, we’ve got
almost 50 nominations here so that is excellent and thanks very much, er Dave
is very very pleased and he has related that to me personally er it is very
important because obviously this is going to be a hard fought election.”
(UNISON London Regional Secretary to UNISON London Region paid
officials on 21 October 2015).
The recording includes derogatory references to Mr Prentis’ three
election opponents (Roger Bannister, John Burgess and Heather Wakefield) and
their supporters along with a detailed discussion of what London regional staff
can do to bolster the Prentis campaign in the days running up to the start of
the postal ballot on 9 November. There is also an explicit warning not to get
“caught out”, while mention of the union’s election rules provokes widespread
laughter.
5. Team Dave campaign emails
The public were first made aware of the Team Dave campaign emails
when an article appeared in Private Eye in early February.
You can read the Private Eye article here https://www.scribd.com/doc/312252796/Private-Eye-p-38-Feb-2016
Here are some extracts from the above Private Eye article:
“Leaked emails reach the Eye providing more evidence that
full-time staff of Unison mobilised to get general secretary Dave Prentis
re-elected in December making the union’s claim to be a “member-led” look
increasingly questionable.”
And
“The emails passed to the Eye from within the Prentis campaign
indicate that Unison officials were in fact the backbone of “Team Dave”. The
emails were sent by assistant general secretary Cliff Williams in October and
November. The bulk of the recipients were other Unison officials – a rough
count shows 45 of 50 addresses are regional secretaries, head office staff and
other unison staff.”
“One striking “Team Dave” note says: “it may be in some
circumstance you may be able to ‘circumvent’ hostile branches by working with
sympathetic employer contacts. I acknowledge that some colleagues may feel this
is ethically inappropriate but it doesn’t breach campaign rules; it will have
to be done with caution.”
It may not break campaign rules, but it still doesn’t look good.
Similarly, having Unison officials lead the Prentis campaign doesn’t match the
spirit of the union being “member led”.
The third extract above is in our view one of the most damming,
especially for those grassroots reps and members who have been fighting
employers who are sacking, privatising or cutting the Terms and Conditions of
our members. The idea that union paid unelected officials would go behind the
backs of locally elected branch officials is appalling and has no place in a
trade union. To date there has been no condemnation of these remarks or any
investigation.
Repeated calls for an independent investigation were turned
down.
The “Team Dave” emails provide a context to the content of the
audio tape of the meeting in London on 21 October 2015.
Read Three earlier Private Eye articles here
1. Unison on tape
2. A family affair
3. A greasy poll
End.
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Saturday, 10 December 2016
#Unisongate Burgess and Ors. v UNISON Complaint 4
Dear UNISON members and all trade union members.
As the the date of the three day hearing approaches, people are asking:
1. "What is #Unisongate and what are you complaining about?
2. "Can members of the public attend the hearing?"
The hearing which is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC runs for three days
starting:
Monday 19 December to Wednesday 21 December inclusive
Venue: Fleetbank House, LONDON, EC4Y 8JX
Complaint 4
During a meeting which took
place on 16 September 2015, UNISON breached paragraph 51 of the General Secretary
2015 Election Procedures which are made under rules D7 and E3.3 and paragraph 7
of Schedule C to the UNISON rule book. This meeting took place between 0900 and
1200 at the University of London Union. This meeting was a conference for all
Regional Staff and was called for and chaired by Linda Perks, the Regional
Secretary of London Region. The UNISON General Secretary election was discussed
at this meeting. Linda Perks allegedly stated at this meeting that Dave Prentis
was the only credible candidate for General Secretary and allegedly sought to
influence her staff to secure nominations for Dave Prentis. Both this meeting
itself, and the discussion/statement made by Linda Perks, amount to the use of
UNISON funds, resources and property to campaign for Dave Prentis.
Background
#Unisongate complaints:
To understand some of the issues please listen and read the
information and links below which have been all online in the public domain for
almost 10 months.
1. Whistleblowing tape – 21 October 2015
A damning audiotape emerged in early December 2015 provided
evidence that senior officials of Britain’s biggest public service union,
UNISON, had allegedly acted in blatant breach of the union’s own rules to
secure the incumbent general secretary’s re-election.
The 23-minute tape appeared on an Anonymous Blog here:
The audio file can be downloaded online here:
The audio recording largely features the voice of UNISON’s London
regional secretary, repeatedly thanking paid union officials under her
management for their work in securing branch nominations for the three-term
incumbent UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis.
“We have done very well and I want to thank everybody and
congratulate them on getting the nominations that they have got. This is a list
of the Greater London branch nominations for Dave Prentis the deadline closed
last Friday, I do not have a list of the other candidates, and that will appear
in due course but I haven’t got it. But we have done very well, we’ve got
almost 50 nominations here so that is excellent and thanks very much, er Dave
is very very pleased and he has related that to me personally er it is very
important because obviously this is going to be a hard fought election.”
(UNISON London Regional Secretary to UNISON London Region paid
officials on 21 October 2015).
The recording includes derogatory references to Mr Prentis’ three
election opponents (Roger Bannister, John Burgess and Heather Wakefield) and
their supporters along with a detailed discussion of what London regional staff
can do to bolster the Prentis campaign in the days running up to the start of
the postal ballot on 9 November. There is also an explicit warning not to get
“caught out”, while mention of the union’s election rules provokes widespread
laughter.
2. Team Dave campaign emails
The public were first made aware of the Team Dave campaign emails
when an article appeared in Private Eye in early February.
You can read the Private Eye article here https://www.scribd.com/doc/312252796/Private-Eye-p-38-Feb-2016
Here are some extracts from the above Private Eye article:
“Leaked emails reach the Eye providing more evidence that
full-time staff of Unison mobilised to get general secretary Dave Prentis
re-elected in December making the union’s claim to be a “member-led” look
increasingly questionable.”
And
“The emails passed to the Eye from within the Prentis campaign
indicate that Unison officials were in fact the backbone of “Team Dave”. The
emails were sent by assistant general secretary Cliff Williams in October and
November. The bulk of the recipients were other Unison officials – a rough
count shows 45 of 50 addresses are regional secretaries, head office staff and
other unison staff.”
“One striking “Team Dave” note says: “it may be in some
circumstance you may be able to ‘circumvent’ hostile branches by working with
sympathetic employer contacts. I acknowledge that some colleagues may feel this
is ethically inappropriate but it doesn’t breach campaign rules; it will have
to be done with caution.”
It may not break campaign rules, but it still doesn’t look good.
Similarly, having Unison officials lead the Prentis campaign doesn’t match the
spirit of the union being “member led”.
The third extract above is in our view one of the most damming,
especially for those grassroots reps and members who have been fighting
employers who are sacking, privatising or cutting the Terms and Conditions of
our members. The idea that union paid unelected officials would go behind the
backs of locally elected branch officials is appalling and has no place in a
trade union. To date there has been no condemnation of these remarks or any
investigation.
Repeated calls for an independent investigation were turned
down.
The “Team Dave” emails provide a context to the content of the
audio tape of the meeting in London on 21 October 2015.
Read Three earlier Private Eye articles here
1. Unison on tape
2. A family affair
3. A greasy poll
End.
#Unisongate Burgess and Ors. v UNISON Complaint 3
Dear UNISON members and all trade union members.
As the the date of the three day hearing approaches, people are asking:
1. "What is #Unisongate and what are you complaining about?
2. "Can members of the public attend the hearing?"
The hearing which is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC runs for three days starting:
Monday 19 December to Wednesday 21 December inclusive
Venue: Fleetbank House, LONDON, EC4Y 8JX
Complaint 3
On or about 21 October 2015 to
on or about 18 February 2016, UNISON breached section 49(6) of the Trade Union
and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in that it failed to ensure that
the Scrutineer duly carried out his functions and that there was no
interference with his carrying out of those functions which would make it
reasonable for any person to call the Scrutineer's independence in relation to
the union into question. This is evidenced by the following:-
1. The Scrutineer/ Electoral
Reform Society did not independently investigate and respond to the complaints
that were made to it in relation to the General Secretary 2015 Election in
accordance with the terms of reference of the election timetable and procedure.
Specifically with reference to the complaints arising from the disclosure of
the audio tape of the meeting held on 21 October in the UNISON Greater London
Regional Office.
2. The ERS issued guidance on
21 October that informed branches and nominating bodies they could now inform
their members why they had chosen to make a particular nomination. This
guidance was issued after an email from Team Dave, dated 15 October 2015, which
informed UNISON branches that they could publish the fact of their nomination
together with the reason why. Prior to the issuing of the guidance by the ERS
it was established procedure and known throughout the union that branches could
only inform their members who the branch had nominated and not why. In any
event the new guidance was not endorsed by the NEC as required by rule.
3. The Returning Officer, Alex
Lonie, was sent Team Dave emails in January 2016. Mr Lonie neglected to refer
to them in his official Returning Officer report published on 18 February.
4. The ERS was asked by
Private Eye magazine about the Team Dave emails and their investigation at a
time before the report was published and at a time when the ERS should have
been conducting an independent investigation. In its response, the ERS informed
Private Eye - "UNISON is preparing a report for Mr Lonie which would
enable him to decide if the election was properly conducted. UNISON would then
in turn report his decision back to its members."
Background
#Unisongate complaints:
To understand some of the issues please listen and read the
information and links below which have been all online in the public domain for
almost 10 months.
1. Whistleblowing tape – 21 October 2015
A damning audiotape emerged in early December 2015 provided
evidence that senior officials of Britain’s biggest public service union,
UNISON, had allegedly acted in blatant breach of the union’s own rules to
secure the incumbent general secretary’s re-election.
The 23-minute tape appeared on an Anonymous Blog here:
The audio file can be downloaded online here:
The audio recording largely features the voice of UNISON’s London
regional secretary, repeatedly thanking paid union officials under her
management for their work in securing branch nominations for the three-term
incumbent UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis.
“We have done very well and I want to thank everybody and
congratulate them on getting the nominations that they have got. This is a list
of the Greater London branch nominations for Dave Prentis the deadline closed
last Friday, I do not have a list of the other candidates, and that will appear
in due course but I haven’t got it. But we have done very well, we’ve got
almost 50 nominations here so that is excellent and thanks very much, er Dave
is very very pleased and he has related that to me personally er it is very
important because obviously this is going to be a hard fought election.”
(UNISON London Regional Secretary to UNISON London Region paid
officials on 21 October 2015).
The recording includes derogatory references to Mr Prentis’ three
election opponents (Roger Bannister, John Burgess and Heather Wakefield) and
their supporters along with a detailed discussion of what London regional staff
can do to bolster the Prentis campaign in the days running up to the start of
the postal ballot on 9 November. There is also an explicit warning not to get
“caught out”, while mention of the union’s election rules provokes widespread
laughter.
2. Team Dave campaign emails
The public were first made aware of the Team Dave campaign emails
when an article appeared in Private Eye in early February.
You can read the Private Eye article here https://www.scribd.com/doc/312252796/Private-Eye-p-38-Feb-2016
Here are some extracts from the above Private Eye article:
“Leaked emails reach the Eye providing more evidence that
full-time staff of Unison mobilised to get general secretary Dave Prentis
re-elected in December making the union’s claim to be a “member-led” look
increasingly questionable.”
And
“The emails passed to the Eye from within the Prentis campaign
indicate that Unison officials were in fact the backbone of “Team Dave”. The
emails were sent by assistant general secretary Cliff Williams in October and
November. The bulk of the recipients were other Unison officials – a rough
count shows 45 of 50 addresses are regional secretaries, head office staff and
other unison staff.”
“One striking “Team Dave” note says: “it may be in some
circumstance you may be able to ‘circumvent’ hostile branches by working with
sympathetic employer contacts. I acknowledge that some colleagues may feel this
is ethically inappropriate but it doesn’t breach campaign rules; it will have
to be done with caution.”
It may not break campaign rules, but it still doesn’t look good.
Similarly, having Unison officials lead the Prentis campaign doesn’t match the
spirit of the union being “member led”.
The third extract above is in our view one of the most damming,
especially for those grassroots reps and members who have been fighting
employers who are sacking, privatising or cutting the Terms and Conditions of
our members. The idea that union paid unelected officials would go behind the
backs of locally elected branch officials is appalling and has no place in a
trade union. To date there has been no condemnation of these remarks or any
investigation.
Repeated calls for an independent investigation were turned
down.
The “Team Dave” emails provide a context to the content of the
audio tape of the meeting in London on 21 October 2015.
Read Three earlier Private Eye articles here
1. Unison on tape
2. A family affair
3. A greasy poll
End.
#Unisongate Hearing begins 19,20,21 December 2016 - Details of how to attend
#Unisongate
This is a public hearing and will commence each day at 10:00 am.
Anyone wishing to attend this hearing should telephone or email the Certification Office (020 7210 3734 / info@certoffice.org) prior to the date.
Venue:
Fleetbank House 2-5 Salisbury Square London EC4Y 8J
Details of all of the complaints can be viewed here
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/561133/PH.2.16-17.pdf
This is a public hearing and will commence each day at 10:00 am.
Anyone wishing to attend this hearing should telephone or email the Certification Office (020 7210 3734 / info@certoffice.org) prior to the date.
Venue:
Fleetbank House 2-5 Salisbury Square London EC4Y 8J
Details of all of the complaints can be viewed here
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/561133/PH.2.16-17.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)